Has anyone had a stent within a stent.
More specifically, has anyone had a reg. stent like the neuroform stent and then had the PED (pipeline embolization device stent) placed within their previous stent?
If so, have you experienced Any complications?
I have a Large (almost Giant- although maybe giant now, if it has grown)
Vertebrobasilar aneurysm.
I first ruptured in Jan. 2013. I had stent assisted embolization (coils and stent,neuroform)
then it rebled, about a month later (or a week after my first 2 week follow-up from the first rupture/hospital stay) in Feb. 2013. I had more coils placed inside the aneurysm.
long story short. They still want to try and place the PED stent.
(this would be their second attempt. First attempt was last Nov., after several hours they were unsuccessful. They were unable to get through the previous stent's struts to deploy the PED, and I also had catheter induced spasms, and that is when they decided to stop)
They set me up w/ Dr. Neil Martin for a Bypass surgery(UCLA)(would have been STA-PCA :superficial temporal artery-to post cerebral artery bypass, with coiling off one of the vertebral arteries/anni) That was in JUne. Unfortunately, they had complications w/ getting the lumbar drain in my back, needed to make an incision in my back. Once in, the drain was too slow. (to drain the cerebral spinal fluid) and they decided to stop. Then after they released me from the hosp. My back incision got infected. w/ staph and cellutitis. So back to the hosp. for another week. Was sent home w/ a PICC line for IV antibotics, and a wound-vac(they reopened the back incision, cleaned it out, and now I have a large hole/wound)-so I have in home nurse care. In the meantime, they said they think the Bypass would be too risky(which started but never got to the critical part- still had my head shaved, the STA dissected, then just wrapped up, closed up w/ staples) and I need to look into all endovascular options.
So frustrating!!!!!
Im afraid Of the PED. When I woke up in Nov. and they told me it didnt work. Honestly I was very relieved. I was so happy. I felt like it was a sign it wasnt meant to be!!!
sure I was at risk, but I wanted them to find a diff. solution.
Well, the bypass plan didnt really go as hoped, and now, I feel that too wasnt really meant to be. Im still being watched over. Surgeon said he didnt want irreversible consequences for me...
Back to the endovascular surgeon I go.
They told me they want to try a new software that would help them see better- If this works, it would be to guide the catheter through stent's struts to deploy the PED...
another option I was told was to close off one of the vertebral arteries to relieve pressure going into the aneurysm/ ( we have to vertebral arteries- he thinks by closing off one, it should still be enough to get blood flow to circulate to the rest of the brain by the little branches that we have in the neck...)
so, if the software proves to be not helpful, that would be the next plan..
BUT, I recently got an email in response to my questions regarding all the radiation Ive had- and they still would want to move fwd w/ the PED.
I wrote them this:
Physician-patient communication before and after interventional fluoroscopy
Operators should always ask the patient about any previous history of interventional fluoroscopy before undertaking another procedure. It is important to communicate the details of the procedure, patient dose, and immediate and potential long-term health effects to patients and their primary care providers.
Before procedure
Patients should be counseled on radiation-related risks, as appropriate, along with the other risks and benefits associated with the procedure. If patients are likely to have multiple interventional fluoroscopy procedures in a short period of time, they should be informed if there is a possibility that significant radiation exposures may accompany these procedures and may cause potential short-term and long-term radiation-related health effects.
After procedure
After a procedure, the measured or estimated radiation dose should be reviewed (Miller 2004), and appropriate steps should be taken to insure adequate patient follow-up:
- Schedule a follow-up visit 30 days after the procedure for all patients who received a radiation skin dose of 2 Gy or more or a cumulative dose of 3 Gy or more.
- Send the interventional fluoroscopy procedure description, operative notes, doses and information about possible short-term and long-term effects to the patient's primary care provider.
- The patient and primary care physician should be specifically requested to notify the operator if observable skin effects occur.
"It is usually my custom to talk about radiation, and I thought that I did. I am sorry if I did not, or if this was not stressed in our discussions. Radiation exposure is always an issue, but considering your aneurysm and the hemorrhages, the larger issue is stabilizing your aneurysm. Certainly there are risks with the amount of radiation you have had. As you say, I mentioned the risk of delayed tumor formation. That remains true. But your risk of the aneurysm rupturing is an immediate risk and a far higher risk than the radiation exposure. We do try and minimize the exposure, but with a difficult aneurysm such as yours, long procedure times are inevitable.
On the other question you had, I have now used the new artifact reduction algorithm, and it is quite good. My expectation is that it will help us to navigate the stent. If you would like us to try, in one procedure, to do the angio and pipeline stent, we can. Please let me know"
I still feel uneasy about the pipeline. Not sure if it's instinct or fear telling me no to do it...
I do know Im still at major risk- and wish there was a guarantee I could be helped
w/o any further complications.. I know, I know...
so back at my research-
If any have experiences and/or advice
I would greatly appreciate it thank you!
176-UCLAscanLTvert1EDITED.jpg (240 KB) 177-BackAngio.Edit.jpg (620 KB)