Merl....
Just my opinion..no I have never had pot...I grew up in the time of "illegal"...I mean, and hey, my husband did not even smoke tobacco cigs...none of this even after being drafted during the VN war...
Marijuana was illegalized in 1937...some time in the 1920s alcohol was illegalized...and, reversed to legal...(can't remember dates) but not at all near 80 years...(I'd have to study history)...
However, I do not know of any "illegalized" pharmafia drugs"... they get "recalled"...after a high level of reactions/deaths...
Additionally...there are numerous mushrooms...from fatal to highly healthy...so my childlike wonder is if there is some "scientific team" is deciding which mushroom should be "illegalized"...and, if any "other" weeds should be illegalized...
There has been tremendous media coverage on the potential issues of marijuana...and, limited to no media coverage on recalls of drugs...however, our networks are likely/presumabyhighly financed by the advertising of the health care industry...(HCI) a/w/a other media coverage (the paper/magazine)
Additionally, tobacco advertising on the networks was stopped in 1971...the pharmafia advertising of drugs began (legally, of course) in 1991...so some of us can become so dilbertonian...
Our HCI includes the drugs (first and likely most), then the health insurance companies, and more recently (memory does not allow "timeframe")...our hospitals/clinics...(whatever else I am memory lapsing)
My high curiosity is how much the cost of that advertising may / may not relate to the increase in "hospital expenses"...for use in their contractual negotiations with "our" medical insurance companies which likely/presumably use that increase a/w/a as their own advertising costs to raise our monthly insurance premiums... and, those have to be presented to our state level "insurance commissioners"... (or similar title who are state tax salaried)...
When a hospital and insurance drop their contract...then the patient/subscriber...has to either find a new doc /facility under their "policy"... .. and/or if they so admire /respect the facility/docs ...they then must change their insurance policy...
it is very complex....and, we tax salary those involved in big decisions, too..
I will either be dropped by docs/facilities (have been already by some - another chapter or two.. )...it is such a political issue... and, I could write ten more chapters...I've barely made the titles here..,tho have used limited dilbertonianism...next time I see a neurologist or psychologist I will ask them what tests they use for dilbertonianism...a/w/a all the other dementia titles/descriptions (or is that "style"?)
P.S....I also belong to a co-op for the organics...to avoid all the promoted chemicals for increased growth...etc..
Merl said:
Hey Moltroub, By no means am I endorsing marijuana as a treatment and I agree that individuals need to be sure of the laws and regulations within their own jurisdiction. I also agree that consultation with medical professionals is a must as for some individuals it may NOT be appropriate, nor safe for some individuals. Due to international treaties namely Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 which the U.S. enforced upon other nations, the science behind cannabis was heavily restricted. This is now starting to change. It has primarily been the HUGE pharma companies and the govt that have pushed the pharma concoctions (and their awful side effects) on to us. Let's face it, opium is an illegal subatance. But once the pharmas have put it through their processes it is sold to us in many forms. It needs to be known that there are alternatives to the pharmas.
But, from my own personal experience I have received a benefit and as an 'alternative therapy' I do believe that it does warrant further investigation and not just be written off as it is an 'illicit substance'.
Merl